Studies concerning EQ have been reported from Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East, and North America. Although they are vary widely in their quality, they include a number of individually well-done and convincing demonstrations of the predictive power of EQ
. Accumulating findings suggest EQ
may predict important outcomes in several areas as below:
1. Better relations for children. Among children and adolescents, EQ positively correlates with good social relation and negatively correlate with correlates with social deviance, measure both in and out of school as reported by children themselves, their family members and their teachers.
2. Better social relations for adult. Among adults, higher EQ leads to greater self-perception of social competence and less use of destructive interpersonal strategies.
3. High EQ individuals are perceived more positively by others. Others perceive high EQ
individuals as more pleasant to be around, more empathic, and more socially adroit than those low in EQ
.
4. Better family and intimate relationships. EQ is correlated to some aspects of family and intimate relationships as reported by self and others.
5. Better academic achievement. EQ is correlated with higher academic achievement as reported by teachers, but generally not with higher grades once IQ is taken into account.
6. Better social relation during work. EQ is correlated with more positive performance outcomes and negotiation outcomes in the laboratory, and also with more success at work, according to some preliminary research.
7. Better psychological well being. EQ is correlated with greater life satisfaction and self-esteem and lower rating of depression. It also is correlated with fewer negative physical and behaviour.
EQ, validly measured, is a predictor of significant outcomes across diverse samples in a number of real world domains. It predicts social relations, workplace performance, and mental and physical well-being.
Reference:
1. Mayer J.D. , Roberts R.D. & Barsade S.G. (in press). Emerging Research In Emotional Intelligence, Annual Review of Psychology, 59.
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Outcomes of Emotional Quotient
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Spiritual Quotient (SQ)
Realizing the important of SQ, future medical doctors should take some of their time to learn how to nurture and develop their SQ
properly. With appropriate level of SQ
they will be better and good doctors. If we fail to develop our SQ
, actually we plan to ruin ourselves. Think about it and let us transforming ourselves into a sustainable tommorow.
Thursday, March 26, 2009
What is Emotional Quotient (EQ)?
Emotional Quotient is defined as the ability to perceive, express, understand and regulate emotion. Emotionally intelligence people are self-aware. They manage their emotion without being hijacked by overwhelming stress, depression, anxiety, or anger. They can delay enjoyment in pursuit of long-range rewards, rather than being overtaking by immediate impulses. Their empathy enables them to read others’ emotions. They handle others’ emotion skillfully, knowing what to say to a grieving friend, how to courage colleagues, and how to manage conflicts well. Simply said, they are emotionally smart, and thus they often succeed in careers, marriages, and parenting where other academically smarter people fail. Golemen argued that Intelligence Quotient
(IQ) only contributes about 20% to success in life, and other forces contribute to the rest. Emotional Intelligence
is not necessarily related to academic ability. In extreme cases, brain damage may diminish emotional intelligence
while leaving academic intelligence intact. There are considerable evidences showed that emotional intelligence is a determinant of success in a variety of occupational setting, with most of the studies focusing on leaders and those in sales occupations.
Realizing the important of EQ, future medical doctors should take some of their time to learn how to nurture and develop their EQ
properly. With appropriate level of EQ
they will be better and good doctors. If we fail to develop our EQ
, actually we plan to ruin ourselves. Think about it and let us transforming ourselves into a sustainable tommorow.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Unexpected Findings!
In the middle of Jan 09, I did a survey on prevalence of stress among secondary school students (around 100 students) in an ordinary secondary school. The survey showed that the prevalence of stress
among the students was around 27%. The prevalence is higher compared to the prevalence of normal population (less than 10%). It is nearly similar to the prevalence of stress
among medical students which is around 30%. It was unexpected finding because i thought that the prevelance will be much lower, may be less than 15%. This simple survey suggested that even at the secondary school level our students already under high pressure. Let us think for a while about this, what will happen to them if they enter medical school? To verify this finding, we need to conduct a proper survey. However, some lessons to be learnt from this simple survey are teachers should be aware of this problem and early detection of stressed students should be done by the school teachers. Early detection and intervention will reduce negative and unwanted impacts of stress
on the students.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Stress, Stressors and Coping Strategies Relationships
In order to understand the relationships between the stress level, stressors and coping strategies, we must understand 3 components that influence the relationships. The 3 components are affective, cognitive
and psychomotor
component.
Affective component involve in receiving and perceiving stimulants that interact with the person. Emotional Quotient (EQ), Spiritual Quotient (SQ) and Attitudes of the person will influence the person's perception towards the stimulants. This process will lead to either the person perceive the stimulants as stressors or not. If the person perceive it as stressors then it will stimulate the cognitive and the pyschomotor component for further process. In short the affective components act as stress receptors that are influenced by the person's beliefs, motives, intentions and attitudes.
Cognitive component involve in apprasing the stressors. At this level the thought will appraise and analyse the stressors either as challenges or as threats. If the person appraises the stressors as challenges then the stress caused by the stressors will promote the person's performance. However, if the person appraises the stressors as threats then stress caused by the stressors will inhibit the person's performance. Stress that promote the person's performance is called as favourable stress or good stress. Stress that inhibit the person's performance is called as unfavourable stress or bad stress. Stress level of a person will be influenced by the process.
Psychomotor component involve in carry out responses (actions) toward the stressors. The ways of actions are carried out are known as coping strategies. The coping strategies
are influenced by the stressors and the appraisal process at cognitive level. Direct influence of stressors will cause fight or flight phenomenon. Continual interactions between the appraisal and the actions toward the stressors will lead to the adjustment of the person's coping strategies. Coping strategies
that reduce the person's stress level is known as positive coping strategies
. Coping strategies
that increase the person's stress level is known as negative coping strategies
.
In conclusion, the stress level are influenced by the EQ, SQ, attitudes, how the person appraise the stressors, and the ways of a person responses toward the stressors. Thus it is important for everyone to recognize their stressors and the ways they cope with the stress. By doing this they will be able to find ways that work well in reducing their own stress.